Pot să vibecodez CineSend?

Ce construiești

The honest floor: expiring private screener links with a visible per-viewer burn-in, view limits, and an access log. Deterrence, not security.

ce îți trebuie

• ffmpeg
• object storage plus a CDN
• a VPS for the screener pages
• an email sender for invites
• an accurate understanding of what a visible watermark does and does not stop

The purest no on the list · the deliverable is not software, it is a rights holder's permission.

Promptul

Verdictul e NU CHIAR, iar promptul rămâne oricum: nu înlocuiește aplicația, reconstruiește partea care chiar e cod. Restul e moat-ul.

Build me a watermarked private screener site for footage I own: my own film,
a rough cut for producers, a festival submission I control. This is the
deliberately low-stakes floor of CineSend, never a substitute for it when
someone else's unreleased master is involved. Requirements:

- Node + Express + better-sqlite3 on a VPS, media in Cloudflare R2, hls.js for
  playback. Server-rendered pages, no frontend framework.
- I invite viewers by name and email. Each gets a single-use /s/<random-id> link tied
  to that address, with an expiry date and a max view count I set per invite.
- ffmpeg burns the viewer's name, email, and the date into the picture as a semi
  transparent overlay, one encode per viewer, cached in R2 and deleted on expiry. It
  is visible and it is meant to be, deterrence is the entire mechanism.
- Every play logs timestamp, IP, user agent, and how far they watched, shown on an
  /admin page behind basic auth. I can revoke any link instantly.
- Downloads are off, right click is off, and the manifest URL is signed and short
  lived. State plainly in the UI that none of this stops a screen recording.
- SQLite holds invites and the access log, R2 keys and the SMTP credentials come from
  .env. No accounts for viewers, no telemetry, no third party analytics.
- Out of scope: DRM, forensic watermarking, and TV apps. Do not claim to implement
  any of them and do not build a fake watermark that only sounds forensic.
- README: R2 and signed URL setup, per-viewer encode cost and time, and one blunt
  paragraph saying this is deterrence only and must never be used for a title under
  someone else's security requirements.

Ce pierzi

• NexGuard forensic watermarking that survives re-encoding and a phone pointed at the screen
• Widevine, FairPlay, and PlayReady DRM, which require licensed keys issued to companies
• the studio and festival trust that makes anyone send you a master in the first place
• Aspera acceleration for moving finished masters across continents
• branded Apple TV, Roku, Fire TV, and smart TV apps for the screening room
• the audit trail and chain of custody a distribution contract asks for

De ce se plătește în continuare

They pay to be allowed to hold the file. A distributor's security requirements are a contract term, not a preference, and the accepted vendor list is short on purpose. When a screener leaks, forensic watermarking turns a catastrophe into a phone call to one person, and that single capability justifies the whole line item. Nobody is paying 797 dollars a month for a download page.

moat: Brand și încredere Conformitate și reglementări Scara infrastructurii ce e un moat

licensed DRM/forensic watermarking/rights holder trust

Cine l-a construit deja

Să pornești de aici e tot vibecoding: promptul e pentru când o vrei exact în felul tău.

• Nextcloud (se deschide într-o filă nouă) — Self-hosted file sharing with password-protected, expiring share links and access logs. Genuinely solves the delivery half, and stops exactly where the licensed half starts. (alive)
• Shaka Packager (se deschide într-o filă nouă) — Open-source packaging with Common Encryption for Widevine and other DRM systems. Shows the wall clearly: you can encrypt the stream, but the license server and the device keys are not yours to issue. (alive)

Ești de acord?

Aplicații similare

Frame.io 25 $ CAM AȘA Vimeo 41 $ CAM AȘA Iconik 65 $ NU CHIAR