Skip to main content

[verdict][curated prompt][source: linear.app]

Can I vibecode Linear?

// buildable in a weekend, but real gaps stay open

The object model is small: issues, states, labels, cycles, projects. A keyboard-first single-player tracker with a board, cycles, and one-way GitHub sync is a weekend build. What does not survive the copy is the sync engine, real-time multiplayer, and the integration surface (GitHub two-way, Slack, Figma, Sentry) that make Linear the place a team actually agrees on what is being built.

confidence: medium

what it is: Keyboard-first issue tracker and project planner for product teams

Buildability index · an editorial game

  • Price 10 $/month · per seat weight: plus 1
  • Time weekend weight: plus 2
  • Category developer tools no weight
  • Moat collaboration · execution quality · integrations weight: minus 3
  • Confidence medium weight: zero
  • What you lose 5 items weight: minus 2
  • Site linear.app (si apre in una nuova scheda) no weight
Indice: minus 2. think twice

The moat outweighs the price: rebuilding this is a project, not an evening.

Gioco editoriale: il verdetto dice se un agente può, l’indice se conviene.

What you build

Local SQLite issue tracker with prefixed IDs, statuses, priorities, labels, a drag board, rolling two-week cycles, a command palette, and a script that pulls GitHub issues in.

what you need

  • local or hosted database
  • GitHub personal access token for issue sync
  • a box the team can reach if more than one person uses it

Buildable for one person, unbuildable for a team; the moat is agreement, not features.

The prompt

A weekend with a coding agent. The gaps that stay are right below, under “what you lose”.

One-shot prompt EN
Build me a personal issue tracker to replace Linear. Requirements:

- A local web app: Node + Express + better-sqlite3, server-rendered, dark, bound
  to localhost. One SQLite file I back up.
- Issues have an auto ID with a team prefix (ENG-142), a Markdown body, a status
  (backlog, todo, in progress, in review, done, canceled), a priority (urgent to
  none), labels, and a point estimate.
- Keyboard-first: c creates, s status, p priority, l labels, / searches titles,
  bodies, and comments with SQLite FTS5, cmd+k opens a command palette for all
  of it.
- Three views: My Issues, a board with drag between columns, and the current
  cycle, a two-week window with a remaining-estimate burndown. On its last
  day, unfinished issues roll forward, done ones archive.
- node scripts/sync-github.js (octokit, token and repo list in .env) pulls open
  GitHub issues in, keyed on issue number so re-runs update instead of duplicate.
- Pressing b copies a branch name (me/eng-142-short-title) to the clipboard.
- Comments and a per-issue activity log. No accounts, no telemetry, nothing
  leaves the machine except the GitHub calls.
- Out of scope: multiplayer, mobile apps, and writing back to GitHub. Skip auth
  and deploy config, this runs on my machine.
- README: how to run it, where the SQLite file lives, and the GitHub token scope.

Curated prompt: written and reviewed by hand for this app. In English on purpose — it is the language coding agents work best in.

What you lose

  • real-time multiplayer and the sub-100ms sync engine
  • native mobile and desktop apps
  • two-way integrations with GitHub, Slack, Figma, and Sentry
  • Triage, Insights, and Linear Asks
  • the interaction polish that makes people actually file the issue

Why people still pay

An issue tracker is only worth anything when everyone uses it, and people only use one that never makes them wait. Linear sells speed and shared context, not features: the whole team sees the same board update instantly, GitHub PRs close issues on merge, and the roadmap stays honest because filing is faster than complaining. A solo copy tracks your own work fine and settles no arguments.

moat: Collaboration Execution quality Integrations what a moat is

collaboration/sync/integrations

Free alternatives

Not in the mood to build it? These already exist, they are free or open source, and we checked them one by one.

Who has already built it

Starting from here is still vibecoding: the prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.

  • Plane (opens in a new tab) — Open-source project and issue tracker with cycles, modules, and boards; the closest self-hosted Linear analogue. (alive)
  • Huly (opens in a new tab) — Open-source all-in-one platform whose tracker module is an explicit Linear alternative. (alive)

What it costs in a year

10 $/mese 120 $/anno

Listino 10 $ al mese a persona su Linear. L’anno è dodici mesi pieni, senza sconti annuali.

Do you agree?

The vote balance

Ancora nessun voto: il tuo è il primo.

Nessun voto ancora — il primo pesa.

Related apps

Distribuzione dei verdetti n = 996

YES 153 KIND OF 451 — il verdetto di questa app NOT REALLY 392

From a Confusing Brief to a Complete UX/UI A vague brief becomes a navigable app. Product Ad From a Single Photo A photo becomes an animated ad, no code required. Get Claude to Watch Your Videos Claude watches your videos and turns them into text. Higgsfield Inside Claude Code Generate images and video while you code in Claude Code. Turn a Loom Recording Into a Web Page A screen recording becomes a web page, no code. Vertical Shorts With NotebookLM Your sources become a vertical short. Luxury Landing Pages on Lovable A luxury landing page from a single prompt. Excalidraw Running Locally Excalidraw free on your computer, no code. Mistral OCR in Your Workflow Extract text from documents with Mistral OCR. Claude SEO in the Terminal 25 free SEO skills inside Claude Code. Google Search Console inside Claude Code Search Console data inside your terminal. Claude Code Routines Claude working on its own, computer off. Clone a Landing Page in React With v0 Clone a real landing page into React code. Context Economy With Claude Work light and don't burn through Claude's limits. From Prompt to Self-Improving Skill Claude skills that learn from your mistakes. From NotebookLM to Canva: Presentations NotebookLM slides, finally editable in Canva. The Map for Understanding Every AI Tool 12 categories for placing any AI tool. Transparent PNGs With ChatGPT Real transparency, not a fake checkerboard. Animated Infographics With Gemini Infographics that loop, animated with Gemini. Market Research With Deep Research Deep Research as your market analyst. Get Cited by AI Search Engines (AEO) Become a source that ChatGPT and Perplexity cite.