[verdict][generated prompt][source: stackby.com]
Can I vibecode Stackby?
// buildable in a weekend, but real gaps stay open
The core loop is buildable, but a dependable replacement becomes a real weekend or multi-day project. For Stackby, build a small table-based operational tracker with views and API columns. The hard boundary is templates, integrations, api columns, collaboration, and hosted sync, plus data model flexibility, collaboration, and integrations.
confidence: medium
what it is: Build a small table-based operational tracker with views and API columns
Buildability index · an editorial game
- Price 5 $/month weight: plus 1
- Time multi-day weight: plus 1
- Category databases no weight
- Moat collaboration · integrations · switching costs weight: minus 3
- Confidence medium weight: zero
- What you lose 5 items weight: minus 2
- Site stackby.com (si apre in una nuova scheda) no weight
The moat outweighs the price: rebuilding this is a project, not an evening.
Gioco editoriale: il verdetto dice se un agente può, l’indice se conviene.
What you build
Build a small table-based operational tracker with structured records, provide grid, form, kanban, and filtered views, and expose a documented API.
what you need
- Docker
- PostgreSQL
- self-hosted server
- optional object storage for attachments
Editorial comparison targets the Personal plan and a small-team structured database DIY substitute. Recheck price before merge.
The prompt
A weekend with a coding agent. The gaps that stay are right below, under “what you lose”.
Build a personal replacement for Stackby in an empty repository.
Use Next.js 15, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Drizzle ORM, and Docker Compose; do not offer alternative stacks.
The core loop is: build a small table-based operational tracker with structured records, provide grid, form, kanban, and filtered views, and expose a documented API.
Make the first run work locally with one documented command.
Store all user data locally by default and make export straightforward.
Put secrets in .env, ship .env.example, and never commit credentials.
Create workspaces, bases, tables, fields, records, attachments, relations, and saved views.
Support text, number, currency, date, boolean, select, formula-lite, and relation field types.
Build grid, form, kanban, and record-detail views from one canonical schema.
Add role-based permissions, optimistic concurrency checks, audit history, and trash restore.
Provide CSV import or export and a token-authenticated REST API generated from the schema.
Ship migrations, seed data, backups, health checks, and a schema export format.
Include clear empty, loading, success, and recoverable error states.
Add input validation, safe filenames, and graceful handling of unavailable APIs.
Write focused tests for the core transformation and one end-to-end happy path.
Create a README with setup, architecture, permissions, data location, and backup steps.
Do not add accounts, billing, telemetry, analytics, or a hosted control plane.
Deliberately leave out full spreadsheet formula compatibility.
Deliberately leave out hundreds of automations and integrations.
Deliberately leave out large-enterprise governance and vendor-managed scale.
Finish by running the tests and listing the exact commands used. Prompt generated from the data on this page, not reviewed by hand yet. In English on purpose — it is the language coding agents work best in.
What you lose
- templates, integrations, API columns, collaboration, and hosted sync
- real-time multiplayer
- automation and integration breadth
- scale and formula depth
- enterprise permissions
Why people still pay
People still pay for Stackby because teams pay when a flexible database becomes a shared operational system with integrations and years of accumulated business logic. The recurring cost buys schema changes, formulas, permissions, imports, attachments, views, APIs, concurrency, backups, and migrations, not just the visible interface.
moat: Collaboration Integrations Switching costs what a moat is
data model flexibility, collaboration, and integrations
Free alternatives
Not in the mood to build it? These already exist, they are free or open source, and we checked them one by one.
Rejected (2) — and why
- NocoDB Free (si apre in una nuova scheda) — A good table workspace, but it has no linked API-column feature, the reason to use Stackby in the first place.
- Rows Free (si apre in una nuova scheda) — The famous connected-spreadsheet alternative is being folded into Superhuman Docs, so it is not a durable new home.
Who has already built it
Starting from here is still vibecoding: the prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.
- NocoDB (opens in a new tab) — Active open-source no-code database interface and Airtable alternative.
Do you agree?
The vote balance
Ancora nessun voto: il tuo è il primo.
Nessun voto ancora — il primo pesa.